Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.1k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

assembly - What is callq instruction?

I have some gnu assembler code for the x86_64 architecture generated by a tool and there are these instructions:

movq %rsp, %rbp  
leaq str(%rip), %rdi
callq puts
movl $0, %eax

I can not find actual documentation on the "callq" instruction.

I have looked at http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/24594.pdf which is "AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volume 3: General-Purpose and System Instructions" but they only describe CALL near and far instructions.

I have looked at documentation for gnu assembler https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/index.html but could not find the section detailing the instructions it supports.

I understand that its a call to a function, but I would like to know the details. Where can I find them?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

It's just call. Use Intel-syntax disassembly if you want to be able to look up instructions in the Intel/AMD manuals.

The q operand-size suffix does technically apply (it pushes a 64-bit return address and treats RIP as a 64-bit register), but there's no way to override it with instruction prefixes. i.e. calll and callw aren't encodeable in 64-bit mode, so it's just annoying that some AT&T syntax tools show it as callq instead of call. This of course applies to retq as well.

Different tools are different in 32 vs. 64-bit mode. (Godbolt)

  • gcc -S: always call/ret. Nice.
  • clang -S: callq/retq and calll/retl. At least it's consistently annoying.
  • objdump -d: callq/retq (explicit 64-bit) and call/ret (implicit for 32-bit). Inconsistent and kinda dumb because 64-bit has no choice of operand-size, but 32-bit does. (Not a useful choice, though: callw truncates EIP to 16 bits.)

    Although on the other hand, the default operand size (without a REX.W prefix) for most instructions in 64-bit mode is still 32. But add $1, (%rdi) needs an operand-size suffix; the assembler won't pick 32-bit for you if nothing implies one. OTOH, push is implicitly pushq, even though pushw $1 and pushq $1 are both encodeable (and usable in practice) in 64-bit mode.


From Intel's instruction-set ref manual (linked above):

For a near call absolute, an absolute offset is specified indirectly in a general-purpose register or a memory location (r/m16, r/m32, or r/m64). The operand-size attribute determines the size of the target operand (16, 32 or 64 bits). When in 64-bit mode, the operand size for near call (and all near branches) is forced to 64-bits.

for rel32 ... As with absolute offsets, the operand-size attribute determines the size of the target operand (16, 32, or 64 bits). In 64-bit mode the target operand will always be 64-bits because the operand size is forced to 64-bits for near branches.

In 32-bit mode, you can encode a 16-bit call rel16 that truncates EIP to 16 bits, or a call r/m16 that uses an absolute 16-bit address. But as the manual says, the operand-size is fixed in 64-bit mode.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...