What you ask for is impossible for two reasons:
ItemA.GetType()
does not return the compile-time type of the variable ItemA
- it returns the run-time type of the object referred to by ItemA
.
- There's no way you could make
(A)B
result in a representation-changing conversion (i.e. a new A
object) because user-defined conversion operators (your only hope here) cannot convert from derived to base-classes. You're just going to get a normal, safe, reference-conversion.
That aside, what you ask for is very strange; one would think you're trying really hard to violate Liskov's substiution principle. There's almost certainly a serious design-flaw here that you should address.
If you still want to do this; you could write a method that manually constructs an A
from a B
by newing up an A
and then copying data over. This might exist as a ToA()
instance-method on B
.
If you characterized this problem as "How do I construct an A from an existing A?", it makes a lot more sense: create a copy-constructor on A
, whose declaration looks like public A(A a){...}
, which is agnostic to subclass-specific details. This gives you a general means to create an A
from an existing instance of A
or one of its subclasses.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…