The following code generates two CA2000 warnings (among others, but that's not the point).
public sealed class Item: IDisposable
{
public void Dispose() {}
}
public sealed class ItemContainer
{
public void Add(Item item)
{
}
}
public sealed class Test: IDisposable
{
private ICollection<Item> itemCollection;
private ItemContainer itemContainer;
private void Add(Item item)
{
itemCollection.Add(item);
}
public void Initialize()
{
var item1 = new Item(); // no warning
itemCollection.Add(item1);
var item2 = new Item(); // CA2000: call Dispose on object item2
Add(item2);
var item3 = new Item(); // CA2000: call Dispose on object item3
itemContainer.Add(item3);
}
public void Dispose() {}
}
Note that there is no warning generated for item1. It seems, Code Analysis assumes the ICollection
will take responsibility of the item and eventually dispose it.
Is there a way to mark my Add
methods, so that the warning goes away?
I'm looking for something similar to ValidatedNotNullAttribute
for CA1062.
Edit: to make it clear: this is not my real code. In the real code, everything is properly disposed.
It's just that CA does not recognize that the call to my Add
methods transfers ownership.
I would like it to treat my Add methods in the same way it treats ICollection.Add
.
Disposing in the same scope is not an option.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…