Yes, this is possible. In the case where a
is constant, I guess you called scipy.integrate.odeint(fun, u0, t, args)
where fun
is defined as in your question, u0 = [x0, y0, z0]
is the initial condition, t
is a sequence of time points for which to solve for the ODE and args = (a, b, c)
are the extra arguments to pass to fun
.
In the case where a
depends on time, you simply have to reconsider a
as a function, for example (given a constant a0
):
def a(t):
return a0 * t
Then you will have to modify fun
which computes the derivative at each time step to take the previous change into account:
def fun(u, t, a, b, c):
x = u[0]
y = u[1]
z = u[2]
dx_dt = a(t) * x + y * z # A change on this line: a -> a(t)
dy_dt = b * (y - z)
dz_dt = - x * y + c * y - z
return [dx_dt, dy_dt, dz_dt]
Eventually, note that u0
, t
and args
remain unchanged and you can again call scipy.integrate.odeint(fun, u0, t, args)
.
A word about the correctness of this approach. The performance of the approximation of the numerical integration is affected, I don't know precisely how (no theoretical guarantees) but here is a simple example which works:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import scipy as sp
import scipy.integrate
tmax = 10.0
def a(t):
if t < tmax / 2.0:
return ((tmax / 2.0) - t) / (tmax / 2.0)
else:
return 1.0
def func(x, t, a):
return - (x - a(t))
x0 = 0.8
t = np.linspace(0.0, tmax, 1000)
args = (a,)
y = sp.integrate.odeint(func, x0, t, args)
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
h1, = ax.plot(t, y)
h2, = ax.plot(t, [a(s) for s in t])
ax.legend([h1, h2], ["y", "a"])
ax.set_xlabel("t")
ax.grid()
plt.show()
I Hope this will help you.