class TestClass
{
private string _privateString = "hello";
void ChangeData()
{
TestClass otherTestClass = new TestClass();
otherTestClass._privateString = "world";
}
}
This code compiles in C# and the equivalent works in PHP, but can someone explain the reason why otherTestClass._privateString
can be changed here ?
I would have thought an instance of a class should not be able to change a private member variable under any circumstances, and that trying to access otherTestClass._privateString
would give an 'inaccessible due to protection level' error.
This is not the case though, so why does instantiating an object inside its own class let you access the private members ? And should it, doesn't this break encapsulation to an extent ? Or am I missing something obvious ?
- (I'm not asking if the above class design is good practice, just wondering about the theory behind it.)
Edit - Thanks for the answers and comments. To clarify, I'm also interested in knowing if being able to do this is regarded as a positive feature, or if it's a necessary tradeoff for better compile-time checking/code clarity/because most other languages do it that way or whatever. It seems to me ideally the compiler would prevent or warn you about this, but then I'm far from a language designer. Any examples of how it being this way lets you do something useful (without violating encapsulation) that would otherwise be difficult or impossible would be great.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…