Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
549 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

ruby - xpath expression for regex-like matching?

I want to search div id in an html doc with certain pattern. I want to match this pattern in regex:

foo_([[:digit:]]{1.8})

using xpath. What is the xpath equivalent for the above pattern?

I'm stuck with //div[@id="foo_ and then what? If someone could continue a legal expression for it.

EDIT

Sorry, I think I have to elaborate more. Actually it's not foo_, it's post_message_

Btw, I use mechanize/nokogiri ( ruby )

Here's the snippet :

html_doc = Nokogiri::HTML(open(myfile))
message_div =  html_doc.xpath('//div[substring(@id,13) = "post_message_" and substring-after(@id, "post_message_") => 0 and substring-after(@id, "post_message_") <= 99999999]') 

Still failed. Error message:

Couldn't evaluate expression '//div[substring(@id,13) = "post_message_" and substring-after(@id, "post_message_") => 0 and substring-after(@id, "post_message_") <= 99999999]' (Nokogiri::XML::XPath::SyntaxError)

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

How about this (updated):

XPath 1.0:

"//div[substring-before(@id, '_') = 'foo' 
       and substring-after(@id, '_') >= 0 
       and substring-after(@id, '_') <= 99999999]"

Edit #2: The OP made a change to the question. The following, even more reduced XPath 1.0 expression works for me:

"//div[substring(@id, 1, 13) = 'post_message_' 
       and substring(@id, 14) >= 0 
       and substring(@id, 14) <= 99999999]"

XPath 2.0 has a convenient matches() function:

"//div[matches(@id, '^foo_d{1,8}$')]"

Apart from the better portability, I would expect the numerical expression (XPath 1.0 style) to perform better than the regex test, though this would only become noticeable when processing large data sets.


Original version of the answer:

"//div[substring-before(@id, '_') = 'foo' 
       and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) = substring-after(@id, '_') 
       and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) &gt;= 0 
       and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) &lt;= 99999999]"

The use of the number() function is unnecessary, because the mathematical comparison operators coerce their arguments to numbers implicitly, any non-numbers will become NaN and the greater than/less than tests will fail.

I also removed the encoding of the angle brackets, since this is an XML requirement, not an XPath requirement.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...