Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
209 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c# - What's the return type of an anonymous class

I have a class that used to have a string return type. Now I find I need to return more than a string. I was thinking to return something like below:

public string Test()
{
  return ( new { ID = 5, Name= "Dave" } );
}

Is this even possible and if so then what would be the return type? I know it's not string ..

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

As others have said, the best thing to do here is to make a nominal type. I would suggest that the nominal type have the same characteristics as an anonymous type; that is, you should consider making the type immutable and consider making it exhibit value equality.

It is possible to return an anonymous type as object and then use the instance returned elsewhere using a variety of sneaky techniques. You can cast the object to "dynamic" (in C# 4) and then use the properties of the anonymous type, but this is slow and lacks compile-time type checking.

You can also use the "cast by example" trick, which does get you compile-time type checking. However, that trick only works when the anonymous source object and the anonymous example object come from the same assembly.

static T CastByExample<T>(object source, T example) where T : class
{
    return source as T;
}

static object ReturnsAnonymous() { return new { X = 123 }; }

static void DoIt()
{
    object obj = ReturnsAnonymous();
    var example = new { X = 0 };
    var anon = CastByExample(obj, example);
    Console.WriteLine(anon.X); // 123
}

See how sneaky that is? We use method type inference and local variable type inference to tell the compiler "these two things are the same type". This lets you export an anonymous type as object and cast it back to anonymous type.

But you probably should not do this; if you're resorting to such sneaky tricks then you should simply be defining a nominal type in the first place. Also, like I said, the trick only works if the example and the source objects were created in code in the same assembly; two "identical" anonymous types in two different assemblies do not unify to be the same type.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...