You can find the explanation at http://clojure.org/special_forms#if.
It's good to read the whole paragraph, but here's the crucial bit excerpted, emphasis added:
[...] All [...] conditionals in Clojure are based upon the same logic, that is, nil and false constitute logical falsity, and everything else constitutes logical truth, and those meanings apply throughout. [...] Note that if does not test for arbitrary values of java.lang.Boolean, only the singular value false (Java's Boolean.FALSE), so if you are creating your own boxed Booleans make sure to use Boolean/valueOf and not the Boolean constructors.
Compare
System.out.println(Boolean.valueOf(false) ? true : false); // false
System.out.println(new Boolean(false) ? true : false); // false
with
user=> (if (Boolean/valueOf false) true false)
false
user=> (if (Boolean. false) true false)
true
Thus, (Boolean. false)
is neither nil
nor false
, just as (Object.)
is neither nil
nor false
. And as @Chiron has pointed out, it's bad practice to use it anyway.
As for (= false (Boolean. false))
being true, I think @looby's explanation is spot on: Since =
relies on Java's equals
method, the special semantics of conditionals in Clojure don't apply, and boolean equality will be as it is in Java.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…