Does anybody know of a method for specializing a template depending on whether a non-member method is defined? I know there are numerous ways for specializing if a member function exists, but I've never seen a non-member example. The specific problem is specializing the operator<< for shared_ptr to apply the operator<< if the operator<< is defined for T, and printing the mere pointer location otherwise. It would be great if all classes defined operator<< as a member, but unfortunately many use free functions. I'm imagining something like the following:
template <typename T>
typename enable_if< ??? ,std::ostream &>::type operator<<( std::ostream & os, const shared_ptr<T> & ptr )
{
if(ptr)
return os << *ptr;
else
return os << "<NULL>";
}
template <typename T>
typename disable_if< ??? ,std::ostream &>::type operator<<( std::ostream & os, const shared_ptr<T> & ptr )
{
if(ptr)
return os << static_cast<intptr_t>( ptr.get() );
else
return os << "<NULL>";
}
Edit: For posterity, here was the working solution. Note that boost::shared_ptr already has a default operator<< that outputs the address, so the disable_if is unnecessary. Since the operator<< returns a reference, this works. For the general case I suspect this would have to be tailored to reflect the return type of the function in question.
template <typename T>
typename boost::enable_if_c< boost::is_reference<decltype(*static_cast<std::ostream *>(0) << *static_cast<T *>(0) )>::value, std::ostream &>::type operator<<( std::ostream & os, const boost::shared_ptr<T> & ptr )
{
if(ptr)
return os << *ptr;
else
return os << "<NULL>";
}
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…