/* 1 */ Foo* foo1 = new Foo ();
Creates an object of type Foo
in dynamic memory. foo1
points to it. Normally, you wouldn't use raw pointers in C++, but rather a smart pointer. If Foo
was a POD-type, this would perform value-initialization (it doesn't apply here).
/* 2 */ Foo* foo2 = new Foo;
Identical to before, because Foo
is not a POD type.
/* 3 */ Foo foo3;
Creates a Foo
object called foo3
in automatic storage.
/* 4 */ Foo foo4 = Foo::Foo();
Uses copy-initialization to create a Foo
object called foo4
in automatic storage.
/* 5 */ Bar* bar1 = new Bar ( *new Foo() );
Uses Bar
's conversion constructor to create an object of type Bar
in dynamic storage. bar1
is a pointer to it.
/* 6 */ Bar* bar2 = new Bar ( *new Foo );
Same as before.
/* 7 */ Bar* bar3 = new Bar ( Foo foo5 );
This is just invalid syntax. You can't declare a variable there.
/* 8 */ Bar* bar3 = new Bar ( Foo::Foo() );
Would work and work by the same principle to 5 and 6 if bar3
wasn't declared on in 7.
5 & 6 contain memory leaks.
Syntax like new Bar ( Foo::Foo() );
is not usual. It's usually new Bar ( (Foo()) );
- extra parenthesis account for most-vexing parse. (corrected)
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…