How does Bi-directional BFS work?
Simultaneously run two BFS's from both source and target vertices, terminating once a vertex common to both runs is discovered. This vertex will be halfway between the source and the target.
Why is it better than BFS?
Bi-directional BFS will yield much better results than simple BFS in most cases. Assume the distance between source and target is k
, and the branching factor is B
(every vertex has on average B edges).
- BFS will traverse
1 + B + B^2 + ... + B^k
vertices.
- Bi-directional BFS will traverse
2 + 2B^2 + ... + 2B^(k/2)
vertices.
For large B
and k
, the second is obviously much faster the the first.
In your case:
For simplicity I am going to assume that there are no obstacles in the matrix. Here is what happens:
iteration 0 (init):
front1 = { (0,5) }
front2 = { (4,1) }
iteration 1:
front1 = { (0,4), (1,5) }
front2 = { (4,0), (4,2), (3,1), (5,1) }
iteration 2:
front1 = { (0,3), (1,4), (2,5) }
front2 = { (3,0), (5,0), (4,3), (5,2), (3,2), (2,1) }
iteration 3:
front1 = { (0,2), (1,3), (2,4), (3,5) }
front2 = { (2,0), (4,4), (3,3), (5,3), (2,2), (1,1), }
iteration 4:
front1 = { (0,1), (1,2), .... }
front2 = { (1,2) , .... }
Now, we have discovered that the fronts intersect at (1,2), together with the paths taken to get there from the source and target vertices:
path1: (0,5) -> (0,4) -> (0,3) -> (0,2) -> (1,2)
path2: (4,1) -> (3,1) -> (2,1) -> (1,1) -> (1,2)
We now just need to reverse path 2 and append it to path 1 (removing one of the common intersecting vertices of course), to give us our complete path:
(0,5) -> (0,4) -> (0,3) -> (0,2) -> (1,2) -> (1,1) -> (2,1) -> (3,1) -> (4,1)