Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
194 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - Most efficient standard-compliant way of reinterpreting int as float

Assume I have guarantees that float is IEEE 754 binary32. Given a bit pattern that corresponds to a valid float, stored in std::uint32_t, how does one reinterpret it as a float in a most efficient standard compliant way?

float reinterpret_as_float(std::uint32_t ui) {
   return /* apply sorcery to ui */;
}

I've got a few ways that I know/suspect/assume have some issues:

  1. Via reinterpret_cast,

    float reinterpret_as_float(std::uint32_t ui) {
        return reinterpret_cast<float&>(ui);
    }
    

    or equivalently

    float reinterpret_as_float(std::uint32_t ui) {
        return *reinterpret_cast<float*>(&ui);
    }
    

    which suffers from aliasing issues.

  2. Via union,

    float reinterpret_as_float(std::uint32_t ui) {
        union {
            std::uint32_t ui;
            float f;
        } u = {ui};
        return u.f;
    }
    

    which is not actually legal, as it is only allowed to read from most recently written to member. Yet, it seems some compilers (gcc) allow this.

  3. Via std::memcpy,

    float reinterpret_as_float(std::uint32_t ui) {
        float f;
        std::memcpy(&f, &ui, 4);
        return f;
    }
    

    which AFAIK is legal, but a function call to copy single word seems wasteful, though it might get optimized away.

  4. Via reinterpret_casting to char* and copying,

    float reinterpret_as_float(std::uint32_t ui) {
        char* uip = reinterpret_cast<char*>(&ui);
        float f;
        char* fp = reinterpret_cast<char*>(&f);
        for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
            fp[i] = uip[i];
        }
        return f;
    }
    

    which AFAIK is also legal, as char pointers are exempt from aliasing issues and manual byte copying loop saves a possible function call. The loop will most definitely be unrolled, yet 4 possibly separate one-byte loads/stores are worrisome, I have no idea whether this is optimizable to single four byte load/store.

The 4 is the best I've been able to come up with.

Am I correct so far? Is there a better way to do this, particulary one that will guarantee single load/store?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Afaik, there are only two approaches that are compliant with strict aliasing rules: memcpy() and cast to char* with copying. All others read a float from memory that belongs to an uint32_t, and the compiler is allowed to perform the read before the write to that memory location. It might even optimize away the write altogether as it can prove that the stored value will never be used according to strict aliasing rules, resulting in a garbage return value.

It really depends on the compiler/optimizes whether memcpy() or char* copy is faster. In both cases, an intelligent compiler might be able to figure out that it can just load and copy an uint32_t, but I would not trust any compiler to do so before I have seen it in the resulting assembler code.

Edit:
After some testing with gcc 4.8.1, I can say that the memcpy() approach is the best for this particulare compiler, see below for details.


Compiling

#include <stdint.h>

float foo(uint32_t a) {
    float b;
    char* aPointer = (char*)&a, *bPointer = (char*)&b;
    for( int i = sizeof(a); i--; ) bPointer[i] = aPointer[i];
    return b;
}

with gcc -S -std=gnu11 -O3 foo.c yields this assemble code:

movl    %edi, %ecx
movl    %edi, %edx
movl    %edi, %eax
shrl    $24, %ecx
shrl    $16, %edx
shrw    $8, %ax
movb    %cl, -1(%rsp)
movb    %dl, -2(%rsp)
movb    %al, -3(%rsp)
movb    %dil, -4(%rsp)
movss   -4(%rsp), %xmm0
ret

This is not optimal.

Doing the same with

#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>

float foo(uint32_t a) {
    float b;
    char* aPointer = (char*)&a, *bPointer = (char*)&b;
    memcpy(bPointer, aPointer, sizeof(a));
    return b;
}

yields (with all optimization levels except -O0):

movl    %edi, -4(%rsp)
movss   -4(%rsp), %xmm0
ret

This is optimal.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...