Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.1k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

spring - Proper way of streaming using ResponseEntity and making sure the InputStream gets closed

One of our application leaks file handles and we have not yet found the cause for this.

In the code I can see several functions similar to this:

public ResponseEntity<InputStreamResource> getFoo( ... ) {
    InputStream content = getContent(...)
    InputStreamResource isr = new InputStreamResource(content);
    return ResponseEntity.status(HttpServletResponse.SC_OK).body(isr);
}

(if checks and try / catch removed for brevity)

I am sure this section causes the problem because when I loadtest this specific code with JMeter I can see that getContent() fails in this stage:

is = Files.newInputStream(f.toPath());

Normally I would close the InputStream but because this short and simply code I can't close the stream before return or the call of body.

When I run lsof (the code runs on Linux) I can see that thousands of files are open in read mode. So I am sure this problem is caused by the stream not getting closed.

Is there a best practice code I should trade in ?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

you can try to use StreamingResponseBody

StreamingResponseBody

A controller method return value type for asynchronous request processing where the application can write directly to the response OutputStream without holding up the Servlet container thread.

Because you are working on a separate thread, writing directly to the response, your problem to call close() before return is solved.

probably you can start by the following example

public ResponseEntity<StreamingResponseBody> export(...) throws FileNotFoundException {
    //...

    InputStream inputStream = new FileInputStream(new File("/path/to/example/file"));


    StreamingResponseBody responseBody = outputStream -> {

        int numberOfBytesToWrite;
        byte[] data = new byte[1024];
        while ((numberOfBytesToWrite = inputStream.read(data, 0, data.length)) != -1) {
            System.out.println("Writing some bytes..");
            outputStream.write(data, 0, numberOfBytesToWrite);
        }

        inputStream.close();
    };

    return ResponseEntity.ok()
            .header(HttpHeaders.CONTENT_DISPOSITION, "attachment; filename=generic_file_name.bin")
            .contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM)
            .body(responseBody);
}

You can also try to use Files (since java 7)

so you don't have to manage InputStream

    File file = new File("/path/to/example/file");

    StreamingResponseBody responseBody = outputStream -> {
        Files.copy(file.toPath(), outputStream);
    };

As @Stackee007 described in comment, under heavy load in production environment it's a good practice also to define a @Configuration class for a TaskExecutor to tune parameters and manage Async processes.

@Configuration
@EnableAsync
@EnableScheduling
public class AsyncConfiguration implements AsyncConfigurer {

    private final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(AsyncConfiguration.class);

    private final TaskExecutionProperties taskExecutionProperties;

    public AsyncConfiguration(TaskExecutionProperties taskExecutionProperties) {
        this.taskExecutionProperties = taskExecutionProperties;
    }

    //  ---------------> Tune parameters here
    @Override
    @Bean(name = "taskExecutor")
    public Executor getAsyncExecutor() {
        log.debug("Creating Async Task Executor");
        ThreadPoolTaskExecutor executor = new ThreadPoolTaskExecutor();
        executor.setCorePoolSize(taskExecutionProperties.getPool().getCoreSize());
        executor.setMaxPoolSize(taskExecutionProperties.getPool().getMaxSize());
        executor.setQueueCapacity(taskExecutionProperties.getPool().getQueueCapacity());
        executor.setThreadNamePrefix(taskExecutionProperties.getThreadNamePrefix());
        return executor;
    }
    
    //  ---------------> Use this task executor also for async rest methods
    @Bean
    protected WebMvcConfigurer webMvcConfigurer() {
        return new WebMvcConfigurer() {
            @Override
            public void configureAsyncSupport(AsyncSupportConfigurer configurer) {
                configurer.setTaskExecutor(getTaskExecutor());
            }
        };
    }

    @Bean
    protected ConcurrentTaskExecutor getTaskExecutor() {
        return new ConcurrentTaskExecutor(this.getAsyncExecutor());
    }

    @Override
    public AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler() {
        return new SimpleAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler();
    }
}

How to test with mockMvc

You can simply follow this sample code in your integration test as:

    .andExpect(request().asyncStarted())
    .andDo(MvcResult::getAsyncResult)
    .andExpect(status().isOk()).getResponse().getContentAsByteArray();

Content type of ResponseEntity<StreamingResponseBody> is a MediaType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM in this example and you can get byte[] (.getContentAsByteArray()) but you can get String/Json/plaintext of everything depending of your body response content type.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...