Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
869 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

bash - Is it necessary to specify traps other than EXIT?

I see a lot of shell scripts that do:

trap cmd 0 1 2 3 13 15 # EXIT HUP INT QUIT PIPE TERM

In every shell I have access to at the moment, all the traps other than 0 are redundant, and cmd will be executed upon receipt of a signal if the trap is simply specified:

trap cmd 0

Is the latter specification sufficient, or do some shells require the other signals to be specified?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I think trap 0 is executed just prior to script termination in all cases, so is useful for cleanup functionality (like removing temporary files, etc). The other signals can have specialized error handling but should terminate the script (that is, call exit).

What you have described, I believe, would actually execute cmd twice. Once for the signal (for example SIGTERM) and once more on exit (trap 0).

I believe the proper way to do this is like the following (see POSIX specification for trap):

trap "rm tmpfile" 0
trap "exit 1" TERM HUP ... 

This ensures a temporary file is removed upon script completion, and lets you set custom exit statuses on signals.

NOTE: trap 0 is called whether a signal is encountered or not.

If you are not concerned with setting an exit status, trap 0 would be sufficient.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...