No, that is not guaranteed by the standard. Quoting all parts of C++14 (n4140) [expr.reinterpret.cast] which concern pointer–integer conversions, emphasis mine:
4 A pointer can be explicitly converted to any integral type large enough to hold it. The mapping function is
implementation-defined. [ Note: It is intended to be unsurprising to those who know the addressing structure
of the underlying machine. —end note ] ...
5 A value of integral type or enumeration type can be explicitly converted to a pointer. A pointer converted
to an integer of sufficient size (if any such exists on the implementation) and back to the same pointer type
will have its original value; mappings between pointers and integers are otherwise implementation-defined.
[ Note: Except as described in 3.7.4.3, the result of such a conversion will not be a safely-derived pointer
value. —end note ]
So starting with an integral value and converting it to a pointer and back (assuming no size issues) is implementation-defined. Which means you must consult your compiler's documentation to learn whether such a round trip preserves values or not. As such, it is certainly not portable.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…