Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
433 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c - What to do if a posix close call fails?

On my system (Ubuntu Linux, glibc), man page of a close call specifies several error return values it can return. It also says

Not checking the return value of close() is a common but nevertheless serious programming error.

and at the same time

Note that the return value should only be used for diagnostics. In particular close() should not be retried after an EINTR since this may cause a reused descriptor from another thread to be closed.

So I am not allowed to ignore the return value nor to retry the call.

Given that, how shall I handle the close() call failure?

If the error happened when I was writing something to the file, I am probably supposed to try to write the information somewhere else to avoid the data loss.

If I was only reading the file, can I just log the failure and continue the program pretending nothing happened? Are there any caveats, leak of file descriptors or whatever else?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

In practice, close should never be retried on error, and the fd you passed to close is always invalid (closed) after close returns, regardless of whether an error occurred. In some cases, an error may indicate that data was lost (certain NFS setups) or unusual hardware conditions for devices (e.g. tape could not be rewound), so you may want to be cautious to avoid data loss, but you should never attempt to close the fd again.

In theory, POSIX was unclear in the past as to whether the fd remains open when close fails with EINTR, and systems disagreed. Since it's important to know the state (otherwise you have either fd leaks or double-close bugs which are extremely dangerous in multithreaded programs), the resolution to Austin Group issue #529 specified the behavior strictly for future versions of POSIX, that EINTR means the fd remains open. This is the right behavior consistent with the definition of EINTR elsewhere, but Linux refuses to accept it. (FWIW there's an easy workaround for this that's possible at the libc syscall wrapper level; see glibc PR #14627.) Fortunately it never arises in practice anyway.

Some related questions you might find informative:


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...