Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
484 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c# - Do adding properties to an interface prevent creating private/protected "set" in derived types?

Edit: It turns out I missed something obvious, but I'm going to leave the question open in case someone else makes the same obvious mistake. Thanks to those who pointed it out See bottom for explanation.

Is it possible to have a non-public set on a property that is overriding an interface property?

Perhaps I'm having a stupid moment, but it seems to me that having a property defined in an interface implicily requires that no deriving class may provide any non-public set for said property.

Example:

interface IField
{
    bool IsValid { get; }
}

... and since interface properties may not have accessibility modifiers means that:

class Field : IField
{
    public override bool IsValid { get; protected set; }
}

...will not be possible despite the fact that it meets the interface requirements conceptually.

IMO this has large negative implications for encapsulation that might be done via non-public Properties, and prevents a number of common use patters for Propertes.

I'm aware that you can create a non-public SetIsValid member that modifies a common backing store, but that would create an inconsistent pattern and add what would otherwise be code noise were it not necessary.

Have I missed something?


Edit: Yes I have missed something

I'm modifying someone else's code at the moment and just realize that the class I was wrestling with implemented the interface and derived from a base class. And I'm new to c# That's what caused the override confusion.

the actual class looked like:

class Field : IField, BaseField
{
    public override bool IsValid { get; protected set; }
}

...where BaseField implemented the interface as well, but did not implement the set.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This is perfectly legal. You don't need the override keyword (in fact it wouldn't compile) but there's nothing stopping you from doing this:

interface IField
{
    bool IsValid { get; }
}

class Field : IField
{
    public bool IsValid { get; protected set; }
}

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...