Consider the following class:
public class Order {
private String id;
private List<Order> orders = new ArrayList<>();
@Override
public String toString() {
return this.id;
}
// getters & setters
}
NOTE: It is important to note that I cannot modify this class, because I'm consuming it from an external API.
Also consider the following hierarchy of orders:
Order o1 = new Order();
o1.setId("1");
Order o11 = new Order();
o11.setId("1.1");
Order o111 = new Order();
o111.setId("1.1.1");
List<Order> o11Children = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(o111));
o11.setOrders(o11Children);
Order o12 = new Order();
o12.setId("1.2");
List<Order> o1Children = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(o11, o12));
o1.setOrders(o1Children);
Order o2 = new Order();
o2.setId("2");
Order o21 = new Order();
o21.setId("2.1");
Order o22 = new Order();
o22.setId("2.2");
Order o23 = new Order();
o23.setId("2.3");
List<Order> o2Children = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(o21, o22, o23));
o2.setOrders(o2Children);
List<Order> orders = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(o1, o2));
Which could be visually represented this way:
1
1.1
1.1.1
1.2
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
Now, I want to flatten this hierarchy of orders into a List
, so that I get the following:
[1, 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.2, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3]
I've managed to do it by recursively using flatMap()
(along with a helper class), as follows:
List<Order> flattened = orders.stream()
.flatMap(Helper::flatten)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
This is the helper class:
public final class Helper {
private Helper() {
}
public static Stream<Order> flatten(Order order) {
return Stream.concat(
Stream.of(order),
order.getOrders().stream().flatMap(Helper::flatten)); // recursion here
}
}
The following line:
System.out.println(flattened);
Produces the following output:
[1, 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.2, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3]
So far so good. The result is absolutely correct.
However, after reading this question, I had some concerns regarding the usage of flatMap()
within a recursive method. Particularly, I wanted to know how the stream was being expanded (if that's the term). So I modified the Helper
class and used peek(System.out::println)
to check this:
public static final class Helper {
private Helper() {
}
public static Stream<Order> flatten(Order order) {
return Stream.concat(
Stream.of(order),
order.getOrders().stream().flatMap(Helper::flatten))
.peek(System.out::println);
}
}
And the output was:
1
1.1
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.2
1.2
2
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.3
I'm not sure if this is the output that should be printed.
So, I wonder if it's OK to let intermediate streams contain repeated elements. Furthermore, what are the pros and cons of this approach? Is it correct, after all, to use flatMap()
this way? Is there a better way to achieve the same?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os